Joint Preservation: A Comprehensive Guide to Non-Surgical Arthritis Treatment

Joint Preservation: Protecting Your Joints Before Replacement Becomes Necessary

Joint preservation is a comprehensive treatment strategy designed to reduce pain, improve mobility, and maintain healthy joint function while delaying or avoiding joint replacement whenever medically appropriate. Rather than focusing on a single procedure, joint preservation combines accurate diagnosis with individualized treatments such as rehabilitation, image-guided injections, regenerative medicine, radiofrequency ablation, tendon procedures, lifestyle modification, and minimally invasive interventions.

Many patients assume that arthritis inevitably leads to joint replacement. In reality, pain often arises from inflammation, irritated sensory nerves, tendons, bursae, or surrounding soft tissues long before the joint has reached end-stage degeneration. Identifying the true source of pain allows treatment to be directed toward the structures responsible for symptoms, often helping patients remain active while preserving their native joint.

This comprehensive guide explains the principles of joint preservation, available treatment options, who may benefit, when surgery becomes appropriate, and how a personalized treatment strategy can help maintain long-term joint health.

What Is Joint Preservation?

Joint preservation is a comprehensive medical strategy designed to reduce pain, maintain mobility, and protect the body’s natural joints before joint replacement becomes necessary. Rather than relying on a single treatment, joint preservation combines accurate diagnosis with individualized therapies that address the specific structures responsible for pain while helping patients remain active and independent.

Many patients believe arthritis inevitably leads to joint replacement. Although surgery remains an excellent option for advanced joint disease, many painful joints continue to function well for years with appropriate non-surgical treatment. Inflammation, irritated sensory nerves, tendon disorders, bursitis, muscle weakness, and biomechanical abnormalities often contribute more to pain than cartilage loss alone. Identifying these treatable pain generators allows physicians to develop personalized treatment plans that improve function while preserving the native joint whenever medically appropriate.

Joint preservation is commonly used for painful conditions involving the:

• Knee
• Hip
• Shoulder
• Sacroiliac joint
• Thumb (CMC joint)
• Ankle
• Elbow
• Other weight-bearing and frequently used joints

Although every patient’s condition is unique, the overall goals remain consistent:

• Reduce chronic pain
• Improve mobility and physical function
• Maintain participation in work, exercise, and recreational activities
• Slow functional decline associated with arthritis
• Delay or avoid joint replacement when appropriate
• Improve long-term quality of life

Why Do Joints Become Painful?

Joint pain is often attributed solely to “bone rubbing against bone.” While cartilage loss is an important contributor to osteoarthritis, it is rarely the only source of symptoms. In reality, pain can arise from many different structures within and around a joint, each of which may respond to a different treatment approach.

Healthy joints rely on a complex interaction between cartilage, bone, ligaments, tendons, muscles, joint capsule, synovial lining, and sensory nerves. Injury, aging, repetitive stress, inflammation, or abnormal joint mechanics can disrupt this balance, producing pain long before complete joint failure occurs.

Understanding which structure is generating pain is one of the most important steps in developing an effective joint preservation strategy. Two patients with similar X-rays may experience very different symptoms because the underlying pain generators are not the same.

Common sources of chronic joint pain include:

• Articular cartilage degeneration causing increased friction and altered joint mechanics.
• Synovial inflammation (synovitis) producing swelling, stiffness, and inflammatory pain.
• Subchondral bone stress and bone marrow edema that may become significant pain generators as arthritis progresses.
• Tendon degeneration surrounding the joint, including chronic tendinopathy and partial tendon tears.
• Ligament injury or instability resulting in abnormal joint motion and progressive overload.
• Bursitis involving inflamed cushioning sacs adjacent to the joint.
• Muscle weakness and biomechanical imbalance increasing joint loading during everyday activities.
• Sensory articular nerves transmitting persistent pain signals despite relatively preserved joint structure.

Many patients are surprised to learn that severe arthritis seen on imaging may produce relatively little discomfort, while mild degenerative changes can sometimes cause disabling pain. For this reason, imaging findings must always be interpreted together with the patient’s symptoms, physical examination, and functional limitations rather than in isolation.

Joint Preservation Is More Than Cartilage

When most people think about arthritis, they picture cartilage gradually wearing away until bone rubs against bone. Although cartilage degeneration is an important part of osteoarthritis, it is only one component of a much larger process. Many patients experience significant pain even when cartilage loss is relatively mild, while others with advanced arthritis seen on X-rays remain surprisingly comfortable.

The reason is that cartilage itself contains very few pain fibers. Instead, pain often originates from the many other structures that surround and support the joint. As arthritis progresses, inflammation, abnormal joint mechanics, and increased stress on these tissues can stimulate the sensory nerves responsible for transmitting pain.

Joint preservation therefore focuses on identifying which structure is actually generating pain rather than treating every patient with the same intervention.

Common pain generators include:

• Synovial lining (synovitis) producing inflammation, swelling, and stiffness.
• Joint capsule becoming inflamed or contracted, limiting motion and producing pain.
• Subchondral bone developing increased mechanical stress, sclerosis, or bone marrow edema.
• Ligaments becoming stretched or unstable, allowing abnormal joint movement.
• Tendons developing chronic tendinopathy or partial tears that overload the joint.
• Bursae becoming inflamed and painful during movement.
• Sensory articular nerves continuously transmitting pain despite relatively preserved joint mechanics.
• Weak surrounding muscles increasing joint loading and accelerating functional decline.

Recognizing these individual pain generators explains why treatments such as corticosteroid injections, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), TenJet®, physical therapy, or surgery each have different roles. The most effective treatment is the one that addresses the tissue responsible for the patient’s symptoms rather than simply treating the X-ray.

Finding the True Pain Generator

Successful joint preservation begins with an accurate diagnosis. While X-rays and MRI scans provide valuable information about the structure of a joint, they do not always explain why a patient is experiencing pain. Many imaging abnormalities are simply part of normal aging, whereas some painful conditions produce only subtle changes on imaging studies.

For this reason, treatment decisions should never be based solely on imaging findings. Instead, physicians combine the patient’s history, physical examination, imaging studies, and, when appropriate, diagnostic procedures to identify the tissues responsible for pain.

A comprehensive evaluation may include:

• Detailed review of symptoms and activity limitations.
• Physical examination assessing strength, flexibility, stability, range of motion, and provocative maneuvers.
• Weight-bearing X-rays to evaluate joint alignment and arthritis severity.
• MRI to assess cartilage, tendons, ligaments, labrum or menisci, bone marrow changes, and surrounding soft tissues.
• Musculoskeletal ultrasound for dynamic evaluation of tendons, bursae, and fluid collections.
• Image-guided diagnostic injections to determine whether pain arises from a specific joint or surrounding soft tissues.
• Diagnostic sensory nerve blocks when radiofrequency ablation is being considered.

These diagnostic tools allow treatment to be directed toward the structure most responsible for the patient’s symptoms instead of relying on a one-size-fits-all approach.

Building a Personalized Joint Preservation Plan

There is no single treatment that works for every painful joint. Successful joint preservation requires selecting the therapy that best addresses the patient’s primary pain generator, stage of joint degeneration, functional goals, overall health, and previous response to treatment. The objective is to use the least invasive intervention capable of restoring meaningful pain relief and improving function while preserving the native joint whenever possible.

For many patients, treatment begins with education, activity modification, weight management, and a structured rehabilitation program. Others may benefit from image-guided injections to reduce inflammation, regenerative treatments that support tendon healing, or radiofrequency ablation to interrupt chronic pain signals. When structural damage becomes advanced or conservative measures no longer provide adequate relief, surgical intervention may offer the best long-term outcome.

Rather than progressing through a rigid sequence of treatments, physicians continually reassess symptoms, function, imaging findings, and treatment response to determine the most appropriate next step. As a result, two patients with similar imaging studies may follow entirely different treatment pathways based on their individual needs.

The principles of a successful joint preservation strategy include:

• Establishing an accurate diagnosis before initiating treatment.
• Treating the primary pain generator rather than focusing solely on imaging abnormalities.
• Beginning with the least invasive evidence-based therapy likely to improve symptoms.
• Combining complementary treatments when appropriate instead of relying on a single intervention.
• Monitoring progress over time and adjusting treatment as the condition evolves.
• Recognizing when joint-preserving treatments have reached their limits and surgical consultation becomes appropriate.

Lifestyle Modification and Rehabilitation

Lifestyle modification and rehabilitation form the foundation of nearly every successful joint preservation program. Regardless of whether a patient ultimately requires injections, regenerative medicine, radiofrequency ablation, or surgery, optimizing strength, flexibility, and joint mechanics improves both short-term pain relief and long-term function.

Even modest improvements in muscle strength and movement patterns can substantially reduce the forces transmitted across weight-bearing joints. In patients with arthritis, strengthening the muscles surrounding the affected joint often improves stability, decreases pain during daily activities, and slows functional decline.

Important components of rehabilitation may include:

• Targeted strengthening of muscles supporting the affected joint.
• Flexibility exercises to improve range of motion.
• Balance and proprioceptive training.
• Gait analysis and biomechanical correction.
• Core stabilization for lower-extremity disorders.
• Gradual return to recreational and occupational activities.
• Weight management to reduce joint loading.

For every pound of body weight lost, the forces transmitted across the knee during walking may decrease several-fold. Although weight loss cannot reverse arthritis, reducing excessive joint loading often improves pain, walking tolerance, and overall function.

Patients should also understand that remaining active is generally preferable to prolonged inactivity. Carefully selected low-impact exercise helps maintain cartilage nutrition, preserves muscle mass, improves cardiovascular health, and supports long-term joint function.

Image-Guided Joint Injections

Image-guided joint injections are among the most frequently used treatments in joint preservation. By delivering medication or biologic therapies directly to the affected joint under ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance, physicians can improve accuracy while minimizing injury to surrounding structures.

The choice of injectable treatment depends on the underlying diagnosis, severity of arthritis, degree of inflammation, previous response to treatment, and the patient’s long-term goals. No single injection is appropriate for every patient or every stage of arthritis.

Common image-guided joint injections include:

Corticosteroid Injections

Corticosteroid injections reduce inflammation within the joint and often provide rapid pain relief for patients experiencing inflammatory arthritis flares or painful synovitis. Although many patients experience significant improvement, corticosteroids do not regenerate cartilage or permanently alter the progression of arthritis. They are most effective when used selectively as part of a comprehensive treatment plan rather than as repeated long-term therapy.

Hyaluronic Acid (Viscosupplementation)

Hyaluronic acid injections supplement the joint’s natural lubricating fluid and may improve comfort during movement in selected patients with osteoarthritis. While individual results vary, some patients experience improved mobility and pain relief lasting several months. These injections are commonly considered for mild to moderate arthritis and may reduce the need for more invasive treatment in appropriate candidates.

Diagnostic Joint Injections

Not every injection is performed for treatment. Diagnostic injections use a small amount of local anesthetic to determine whether a specific joint is truly responsible for a patient’s pain. A positive diagnostic response may help guide subsequent treatment decisions, including regenerative procedures, radiofrequency ablation, or surgery.

Regenerative Medicine

Regenerative medicine focuses on supporting the body’s natural healing response rather than simply suppressing inflammation. While research in this field continues to evolve, selected biologic treatments have become valuable components of comprehensive joint preservation for appropriately chosen patients.

Among the available regenerative therapies, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has accumulated the strongest clinical evidence for several musculoskeletal conditions, particularly chronic tendinopathy and mild to moderate osteoarthritis. PRP is prepared from the patient’s own blood and contains a concentrated population of platelets that release numerous biologically active growth factors involved in tissue repair.

Unlike corticosteroid injections, which primarily reduce inflammation, PRP aims to improve the biological environment surrounding damaged tissues. Although PRP cannot regenerate advanced cartilage loss or reverse severe arthritis, many patients experience improvements in pain, function, and activity levels following carefully selected treatment.

Other orthobiologic therapies continue to be investigated. While some show promise, evidence supporting their routine clinical use remains limited for many conditions. Patients should understand that not all regenerative treatments are supported by the same quality of scientific evidence.

Joint Radiofrequency Ablation

For some patients, chronic joint pain persists despite rehabilitation, medications, and injections because the sensory nerves surrounding the joint continue to transmit pain signals. In these situations, joint radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may provide longer-lasting pain relief without altering the structural integrity of the joint.

Radiofrequency ablation uses precisely controlled thermal energy to interrupt selected sensory articular nerve branches responsible for transmitting pain. Because the treatment targets sensory nerves rather than the muscles or ligaments responsible for joint stability, patients typically maintain normal strength and movement following the procedure.

Joint RFA has become an established treatment option for carefully selected patients with chronic pain involving the knee, hip, shoulder, sacroiliac joint, and other synovial joints. Most specialists perform diagnostic nerve blocks before recommending radiofrequency ablation to confirm that the targeted sensory nerves are contributing to the patient’s symptoms.

Although radiofrequency ablation does not reverse arthritis or regenerate cartilage, reducing pain often allows patients to participate more comfortably in rehabilitation, remain physically active, and postpone more invasive procedures.

Treating the Entire Joint, Not Just the Arthritis

Successful joint preservation extends far beyond treating damaged cartilage. Every joint functions as part of an integrated system consisting of bones, cartilage, ligaments, tendons, muscles, bursae, joint capsule, and sensory nerves. Dysfunction affecting any one of these structures may increase stress on the others, leading to pain, weakness, and progressive loss of function.

For this reason, effective joint preservation focuses on restoring the health of the entire joint rather than simply reducing arthritis-related pain. Identifying and treating the surrounding tissues responsible for pain often allows patients to move more comfortably, improve strength, and reduce abnormal joint loading.

Common conditions that may be treated alongside arthritis include:

• Chronic tendinopathy involving the rotator cuff, gluteal tendons, quadriceps tendon, patellar tendon, or common flexor and extensor tendons.
• Partial tendon tears that impair function without requiring surgical repair.
• Bursitis affecting structures such as the subacromial, trochanteric, prepatellar, or pes anserine bursae.
• Ligament injury contributing to joint instability and altered biomechanics.
• Muscle weakness reducing dynamic joint stability during daily activities.
• Peripheral nerve irritation producing pain that may mimic or coexist with arthritis.

Treating these associated conditions often improves overall joint mechanics, allowing patients to participate more comfortably in rehabilitation while reducing stress placed on the arthritic joint itself.

The Kinetic Chain: Why Every Joint Affects Another

The human body functions as a connected mechanical system known as the kinetic chain. Movement occurring at one joint influences the forces transmitted through neighboring joints. When one part of the body becomes painful or weak, other regions often compensate, sometimes creating additional problems over time.

For example, chronic hip weakness may alter walking mechanics and increase stress across the knee. Persistent knee pain may change the way a patient walks, leading to overloading of the opposite leg, lower back, or sacroiliac joints. Likewise, shoulder dysfunction may affect the neck, upper back, and surrounding muscles.

Examples include:

• Hip weakness increasing knee loading during walking.
• Knee arthritis producing abnormal gait and lower back pain.
• Foot and ankle abnormalities altering forces transmitted to the knee and hip.
• Rotator cuff dysfunction contributing to abnormal shoulder mechanics and cervical muscle pain.
• Core weakness reducing stability throughout the lower extremities.

Because these relationships are closely interconnected, successful joint preservation frequently requires addressing problems beyond the painful joint itself. Improving strength, balance, flexibility, and movement patterns throughout the kinetic chain may reduce abnormal joint loading and improve long-term outcomes.

When Joint Preservation Is No Longer Enough

Although many patients benefit from joint preservation strategies, non-surgical treatment has important limitations. Some joints eventually develop structural damage that cannot be adequately managed with rehabilitation, injections, biologic therapies, or radiofrequency ablation alone.

Joint replacement or other reconstructive procedures may become the most appropriate treatment when pain remains severe despite comprehensive conservative care or when structural deterioration significantly limits daily function.

Situations in which surgical evaluation should be considered include:

• Advanced bone-on-bone arthritis causing substantial disability.
• Progressive deformity or joint collapse.
• Mechanical instability that cannot be corrected conservatively.
• Large tendon tears requiring surgical repair.
• Failure of well-performed non-surgical treatment.
• Persistent pain that significantly limits quality of life despite appropriate joint preservation measures.

Choosing surgery does not represent a failure of joint preservation. Rather, it reflects the natural progression of certain joint disorders. The goal of joint preservation is to ensure that surgery is recommended at the appropriate time, not performed prematurely or unnecessarily delayed.

Our Philosophy of Joint Preservation

At SpinePain Solutions, we believe every painful joint deserves a thoughtful evaluation before surgery is recommended. Our approach begins by identifying the structures most responsible for pain rather than treating an X-ray or MRI finding in isolation.

Whenever medically appropriate, treatment begins with the least invasive evidence-based option likely to provide meaningful improvement. For one patient, that may involve rehabilitation and activity modification. Another may benefit from an image-guided injection, platelet-rich plasma, radiofrequency ablation, hydrodissection, or a minimally invasive tendon procedure. Some patients ultimately achieve their best result through orthopedic repair or joint replacement.

The goal is not to perform every available treatment or postpone surgery indefinitely. The goal is to select the right treatment at the right time, reduce pain, preserve mobility, and help patients continue the activities that matter most to them.

Minimally Invasive Tendon and Peripheral Nerve Procedures

Joint pain is frequently accompanied by chronic tendon degeneration or peripheral nerve irritation. When these surrounding structures are responsible for a substantial portion of the symptoms, treating them may improve the function of the entire joint.

Percutaneous Needle Tenotomy

Percutaneous needle tenotomy uses a needle to stimulate a controlled healing response within chronically degenerative tendon tissue. The procedure may be considered for selected patients with persistent tendinopathy that has not improved adequately with rehabilitation, activity modification, or injections.

Treatment is commonly performed under ultrasound guidance to accurately identify the abnormal tendon region while avoiding nearby nerves and blood vessels. Needle tenotomy does not replace surgical repair when a tendon is completely ruptured or mechanically nonfunctional.

TenJet® and Ultrasonic Tenotomy

TenJet is a minimally invasive, ultrasound-guided procedure designed to remove selected degenerative tendon tissue through a small incision while preserving healthier portions of the tendon. It may be considered for chronic tendinopathy involving structures such as the common extensor tendon, patellar tendon, Achilles tendon, plantar fascia, rotator cuff, or gluteal tendons, depending on the individual condition.

The objective is to reduce the burden of diseased tissue and create an environment that supports rehabilitation and healing. TenJet does not reconnect a complete tendon rupture or correct severe mechanical instability.

Peripheral Nerve Hydrodissection

Peripheral nerve hydrodissection is an ultrasound-guided procedure in which fluid is carefully placed around an irritated or entrapped nerve to separate it from surrounding fascia, scar tissue, muscle, or other structures. The goal is to improve the nerve’s ability to glide and reduce mechanical irritation.

Hydrodissection may be useful when nerve irritation contributes to pain around a joint, but it is not a treatment for every neuropathy. Progressive weakness, severe nerve injury, or a structural lesion requiring surgery should be evaluated separately.

Medications and Supportive Treatments

Medications may help control pain and inflammation while patients participate in rehabilitation or recover from a procedure. They are usually most effective when incorporated into a broader treatment plan rather than used as the only long-term strategy.

Depending on the patient’s diagnosis and medical history, treatment may include:

• Topical anti-inflammatory medications.
• Oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs when medically appropriate.
• Acetaminophen for selected patients.
• Short-term medications for acute inflammatory flares.
• Medications directed toward neuropathic pain when nerve irritation is present.
• Bracing, orthotics, assistive devices, or supportive footwear when biomechanically appropriate.

Medication selection should account for kidney function, gastrointestinal risk, cardiovascular disease, anticoagulant use, liver function, medication interactions, and other health factors.

When Can Orthopedic Surgery Preserve the Native Joint?

Joint preservation does not always mean non-surgical care. In selected patients, orthopedic procedures may correct a mechanical abnormality and preserve the native joint before replacement becomes necessary.

Depending on the joint and diagnosis, joint-preserving surgery may include:

• Repair of selected tendon, ligament, labral, or meniscal injuries.
• Removal or fixation of unstable cartilage or osteochondral fragments.
• Realignment procedures that redistribute forces across a damaged joint.
• Selected cartilage restoration procedures.
• Correction of impingement or other mechanical abnormalities.
• Arthroscopic procedures when a clearly treatable mechanical lesion is present.

Not every degenerative tear or imaging abnormality benefits from surgery. The potential procedure should address a specific mechanical problem that correlates with the patient’s symptoms and functional limitations.

Joint Preservation vs Joint Replacement

Joint preservation and joint replacement are not opposing philosophies. They are different treatment strategies used at different stages of disease. Preservation focuses on maintaining the natural joint and treating individual pain generators, while replacement addresses advanced structural failure by removing and replacing damaged joint surfaces.

Frequently Asked Questions About Joint Preservation

Can joint preservation cure arthritis?

Joint preservation generally cannot reverse established osteoarthritis. Its purpose is to reduce pain, improve function, treat contributing pain generators, and preserve useful joint function for as long as medically appropriate.

Can cartilage grow back?

Advanced loss of articular cartilage does not reliably regenerate through routine injections or exercise. Selected cartilage-repair procedures may be considered for specific focal defects, but these are different from widespread osteoarthritis.

Is PRP considered joint preservation?

Yes. PRP may be part of a joint preservation plan for selected patients with osteoarthritis or chronic tendon disease. It should be matched to the diagnosis and combined with rehabilitation when appropriate.

Is radiofrequency ablation a joint preservation treatment?

Yes. Joint RFA reduces pain transmission without removing or replacing the joint. It does not repair arthritis, but pain reduction may improve activity, rehabilitation, and function.

Can injections delay joint replacement?

Injections may reduce symptoms and help selected patients postpone surgery. They do not reliably stop structural progression, and repeated temporary treatment should not indefinitely delay replacement when advanced joint failure is present.

Is exercise harmful to an arthritic joint?

Appropriate exercise is usually beneficial. Strengthening, flexibility, balance, and low-impact cardiovascular activity can improve function and reduce joint loading. Exercise should be modified when it causes substantial or persistent symptom aggravation.

Which joints can benefit from preservation strategies?

Joint preservation may be considered for the knee, hip, shoulder, ankle, elbow, thumb, sacroiliac joint, and other painful joints. Available treatments and supporting evidence vary by joint and diagnosis.

Am I too old for joint preservation?

Age alone does not determine candidacy. Diagnosis, remaining joint function, health, activity goals, surgical risk, and expected benefit are more important than a specific age cutoff.

Can several joint preservation treatments be combined?

Yes. A patient may receive rehabilitation, an image-guided injection, tendon treatment, or RFA as part of one coordinated plan when each component addresses a different contributing problem.

How long can joint replacement be delayed?

There is no universal timeline. Some patients maintain acceptable function for years, while others progress more quickly. Treatment should be reassessed when pain, deformity, instability, or loss of independence worsens.

Does joint preservation mean I will never need surgery?

No. Some conditions progress despite appropriate treatment. Joint preservation aims to avoid premature surgery and maintain function, not promise that replacement will never become necessary.

When should I see an orthopedic surgeon?

Surgical consultation is appropriate when there is advanced structural damage, progressive deformity, instability, a repairable tendon or ligament injury, joint collapse, or persistent functional limitation despite comprehensive non-surgical care.

What happens when joint preservation stops working?

The diagnosis, progression of structural disease, and treatment goals should be reassessed. Additional preservation options may remain, or orthopedic repair or replacement may become the more appropriate next step.

How is a joint preservation plan created?

A plan is based on the patient’s history, examination, imaging, functional limitations, medical health, previous treatment response, and individual goals. Diagnostic injections or nerve blocks may provide additional information in selected cases.

Related Services

References

1. Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. The Lancet. 2019;393(10182):1745-1759.
2. Kolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation guideline for management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care & Research. 2020;72(2):149-162.
3. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Management of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline.
4. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hip: Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline.
5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Osteoarthritis in Over 16s: Diagnosis and Management.
6. Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2019;27(11):1578-1589.
7. Messier SP, Mihalko SL, Legault C, et al. Effects of intensive diet and exercise on knee joint loads, inflammation, and clinical outcomes among overweight and obese adults with knee osteoarthritis. JAMA. 2013;310(12):1263-1273.
8. Fitzpatrick J, Bulsara M, Zheng MH. The effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of tendinopathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017;45(1):226-233.
9. American Society of Pain and Neuroscience. Best-practice guidance for radiofrequency neurotomy and peripheral-joint pain.
10. International Pain and Spine Intervention Society. Practice guidance for image-guided musculoskeletal and peripheral nerve procedures.